-  [WT]  [Home] [Manage]

YO DAWG, WE HEARD YOU LIKE mis€™sing҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙ ҉̵̞̟̠̖̗̘̙҉̵̞ SO WE PUT ͇̬̤͍̳̞͉͐ͭͯ̿̅͊̕͜A̸̛͍̜̺͙̗͓͈̰͐̆͠R̳̼̔͂̔ͅB̸͙̝̪̹̼̥͍͚̝̎̋̈̆̓Ąͦ͛ͨ̅̊ͩ̀҉͈̼͖̭̬̱͚̜̲G͑̂̅̂͘� �͈̩̪̫͇E̗͉̰ͪ̇̃̂̉̿̓̋̃͠͠ IN YO ͓̳̔B̸͙̝̪̹̼̥͍̎̋̈̆̓͑̂̅̂J͈̩̪̫͇̗͉̰́ͪ̇̃̂̉̿̓̋̃͘͠͠ SO YOU CAN ͥ̌ͤ҉͙̝̪̹̼̥͍͑̂̅̂͘҉̛̖̩̜̮̗͖͞ WHILE YOU ͥ̌ͤ҉͙̝̪̹̼̥͍͑̂̅̂͘҉̛̖̩̜̮̗͖͞


[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 108)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 2000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 105 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-08-01 Show/Hide Show All

File 125115060696.jpg - (102.45KB , 1000x1000 , 1242626013018.jpg )
108 No. 108
I have a question. Maybe one of y'all can answer.
I am interested in hacking a ROM to make a ??? Plate avaliable in the game to make ??? Arceus
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_wU0h9UlYE
Like in this video.

I understand this won't actually get anywhere and no other game would recognize it, I just think it would be cool to know how to do.
>> No. 109
Can't help you with that I'm afraid, too new and technical for me.

Back in my day we had 8 bits on our Game Boys, and we knew the offset for every variable in every game we had!
>> No. 121
The fact that there's no battle data associated with the "???" type means that your own game would lock up upon doing so. On top of that, creating a whole new item (there is no real ???-plate) and adding a pokemon-ability-activating attribute to it... Well I don't know if that's possible for somebody with even a good amount of experince in ROM hacking, let along someone who (as I must assume you are) wouldn't know a programming language if it hit them over the head with a void main.
>> No. 182
Dear Nona, Please do not pull information out of your ass.

The game would not lock up on ??? because it was built to solve a rare bug that could happen with Judgement. The pokemon is stable.

At least read bulbapedia. Thank you.
>> No. 185
>>182
Dear anonymous, please do not revive long-dead threads for the sole purpose of trolling.

Clearly this thread ended a long while ago, and even though I've since then realized I was dead-wrong, I didn't thing it was worth bumping a thread for information that nobody really cares about.

At least read the rules, specifically #2. Thank you.


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason